Expanded Performance Comparison of the Oncuria 10-Plex Bladder Cancer Urine Assay Using Three Different Luminex xMAP Instruments

Date:	July 10, 2025
PMID:	PMC12294033
Category:	N/A
Authors:	Sunao Tanaka, Takuto Shimizu, Ian Pagano, Wayne Hogrefe, Sherry Dunbar, Charles J Rosser, Hideki Furuya
Abstract:	40722499

Background/Objectives: The clinically validated multiplex Oncuria bladder cancer (BC) assay quickly and noninvasively identifies disease risk and tracks treatment success by simultaneously profiling 10 protein biomarkers in voided urine samples. Oncuria uses paramagnetic bead-based fluorescence multiplex technology (xMAP^®; Luminex, Austin, TX, USA) to simultaneously measure 10 protein analytes in urine [angiogenin, apolipoprotein E, carbonic anhydrase IX (CA9), interleukin-8, matrix metalloproteinase-9 and -10, alpha-1 anti-trypsin, plasminogen activator inhibitor-1, syndecan-1, and vascular endothelial growth factor]. Methods: In a pilot study (N = 36 subjects; 18 with BC), Oncuria performed essentially identically across three different common analyzers (the laser/flow-based FlexMap 3D and 200 systems, and the LED/image-based MagPix system; Luminex). The current study compared Oncuria performance across instrumentation platforms using a larger study population (N = 181 subjects; 51 with BC). Results: All three analyzers assessed all 10 analytes in identical samples with excellent concordance. The percent coefficient of variation (%CV) in protein concentrations across systems was ≤2.3% for 9/10 analytes, with only CA9 having %CVs > 2.3%. In pairwise correlation plot comparisons between instruments for all 10 biomarkers, R² values were 0.999 for 15/30 comparisons and R² ≥ 0.995 for 27/30 comparisons; CA9 showed the greatest variability (R² = 0.948-0.970). Standard curve slopes were statistically indistinguishable for all 10 biomarkers across analyzers. Conclusions: The Oncuria BC assay generates comprehensive urinary protein signatures useful for assisting BC diagnosis, predicting treatment response, and tracking disease progression and recurrence. The equivalent performance of the multiplex BC assay using three popular analyzers rationalizes test adoption by CLIA (Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments) clinical and research laboratories.

---

Acknowledgements:

The content of this article is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Cancer Institute, or the National Institute of Health.

The Translational and Basic Science Research in Early Lesions (TBEL) Research Consortia is supported and funded by grants from the National Cancer Institute and the National Institutes of Health under the following award numbers:

Project Number:	Awardee Organization
U54CA274374	Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center
U54CA274375	Houston Methodist Research Institute
U54CA274370	Johns Hopkins University
U54CA274371	UT MD Anderson Cancer Center
U54CA274367	Vanderbilt University Medical Center